Skip to main content
Version: v2 beta

Sources and corpus

This page identifies the main source families and explains how the methodology uses them.

Contributions from product category rules​

These five documents inform the method without replacing its structure or calculation conventions. Footnotes on the relevant pages identify the passages used.

Document reviewedContributionWhere the D4B difference is explained
Digital services PCR, June 20261Lifecycle, quality, sixteen EF categoriesIndicators and data quality
Application PCR, June 20262Whole application, software stages, third partiesBoundary and service modelling
Cloud PCR, June 20263Nested units, allocations, GPU limitationCloud use case
Information-system PCR, November 20244Annual system, support, professional useEquipment fleet
Internet access PCR, 71-page report5Fixed contribution and variable trafficNetwork

The application PCR cites an April 2025 cloud PCR and a November 2023 version of the Internet access PCR. The cloud report reviewed here is dated June 2026; the Internet access catalogue entry was published in 2023. These version references remain distinct. Numerical examples are not transposed without checking units, boundaries and sums.

This synthesis prioritises additions compatible with D4B. It is neither a PCR compliance statement nor a new version of the calculation engines.

Documentary corpus​

The corpus brings together scientific publications, sector methods and provider documentation. It supplements the PCR frameworks and the Digital4Better data catalogue.6

The 19 October 2026 review focuses on boundaries, allocations, units and limitations relevant to v2. It is neither validation of every coefficient nor a systematic literature review.

Corpus contributions and reuse decisions​

Source family examinedUse in the methodologyReuse limitation
ADEME GPU 2026, More than Carbon, How Hungry is AI?, Shift ProjectHardware boundaries, GPU hours, inferred data and deployment effectsNo universal per-query result or equivalence between an estimate and a measurement
imec.netzero v6.2, annexes and v5.1 reviewProcesses, packaging, yields and versionsA version-specific review does not validate subsequent versions
PAIA, IBM, Dell, Amazon, HPEPCF interpretation, configurations, phases and uncertaintyNo automatic product ranking; source-specific reuse conditions apply
UBA Green Cloud Computing, OVHcloudComponents, shared resources and cloud allocationReservations, activity and provider conventions remain distinct
Lövehagen et al., Resilio/Aguaro, Tannu/Nair and SeagateCross-checking data and hardware/storage comparison limitsSamples and differing boundaries prevent a universal average
BASF and Pathfinder v2PCF traceability and value-chain dataTheir carbon boundaries and sector rules do not replace D4B's multicriteria LCA

References are attached to the relevant statements in each chapter. Sample data do not become default values.

A transcription is not an independent source. Footnote markers, exponents, units and columns may be altered during extraction. An unreadable or inconsistent value remains excluded until it can be checked against the original.

Source families​

Four main families are used:

  • methodological frameworks.
  • scientific and technical literature.
  • open data and factor datasets.
  • manufacturer and provider documentation.

Main reference sources​

The principal sources are:

  • digital4better/data, the canonical repository for data and factors.
  • ADEME Base Empreinte, particularly multicriteria factors for equipment and selected digital services.
  • sufficiently documented manufacturer data, reviewed critically.
  • the scientific and methodological publications cited in the chapters.

What is used from Base Empreinte​

Base Empreinte brings together data and frameworks for LCA and greenhouse gas accounting. For digital assessments, it provides:

  • multicriteria equipment factors.
  • factors for selected digital services with defined functional units.
  • an official reference for some generic estimates.

Review carefully:

  • reference quantity.
  • implicit lifetime.
  • actual coverage.
  • compatibility between factors.

Confidence​

Confidence does not depend on a source's reputation alone. It also depends on its fit to the study object, date, traceability, detail and consistency with other evidence.

Assumptions and limitations​

This page provides an overview. The dedicated register records retained values and substitutions.

Sources​

Targeted review of 16 October 2026​

This review addresses topics affecting the models published here. It is not an exhaustive systematic literature review. The review date is an access date; each source's publication date remains separate.

Source and statusContributionConsequence for the methodology
SCI for AI, GSF specification, ratified December 2025Provider/consumer boundaries and AI life cycleDevelopment, experiments, orchestration and reserved resources included, with consistent functional units
GSF Reference Implementations, 28 May 2026Educational SCI for AI implementationImplementation and verification resource, not simulator certification
Falk et al., More than Carbon, version 3, December 2025Multicriteria LCA of an A100 acceleratorManufacturing and cross-indicator tradeoffs retained; results specific to the assessed GPU
López-Rauhut et al., Moshi research footprint, preprint, April 2026Research activities in a multimodal model's boundaryExperiments and preparation included in model life cycle studies
Boavizta CPU, RAM, SSDDocumented parametric equations and coefficientsExplicit surface units, per-module constants and densities; no support for undocumented process-node factors
Boavizta GPUAccelerator-card decompositionA complete card cannot be reduced to the historical CPU model; its inventory includes memory, board, cooling and covered life cycle stages
imec SSTSSemiconductor manufacturing process modelingSimplified D4B multipliers remain assumptions; the presentation does not establish universal process-node calibration
D4B snapshot 77cae4aAnnual electricity factors available for 2025Versioned local country snapshot; data year distinct from access date

Older sources remain useful when they precisely describe an inventory or equation. Their age is a representativeness limitation to document, not an automatic reason for removal. Unreproducible exploratory coefficients are distinguished from published values in the Assumptions register.

Verified public data tree​

The tree at commit 77cae4a58fadd5deb3b8d4e5577020da08f780d8 was checked on 16 October 2026. Existing families include data/ai, data/cloud, data/country, data/energy, data/equipment, data/facility, data/factor, data/mix and data/transport. The previously cited data/hardware directory does not exist in this snapshot. CPU/accelerator characteristics are under data/cloud; detailed terminal inventories and lifetimes need identified sources rather than assumed paths.

Footnotes​

  1. ADEME, RCP services numériques, version 2, juin 2026, p. 13–25. ↩

  2. ADEME, RCP des applicatifs numériques, juin 2026, p. 6, 13–16, 54. ↩

  3. ADEME, RCP services cloud et centre de données, juin 2026, p. 18, 26–64. ↩

  4. ADEME, RCP des systèmes d’information, mise à jour novembre 2024, p. 8–14. ↩

  5. ADEME, RCP de la fourniture d’accès Internet, rapport de 71 pages diffusé par l’ADEME (fiche publiée en 2023), p. 7, 17, 31–32. ↩

  6. Digital4Better, documentary corpus listed on this page (reviewed 19 October 2026) and data catalogue, snapshot 77cae4a. ↩